Friday, 2 October 2015

Two Rottweiler dog attacked another neighbour dog : FIR Filed Against the Rottweiler Pet Owner

On 28th September 2015, A Maid named Beena Parihar was on her regular walk in the evening with the pet female dog named Ninja, and the owner of Ninja is  Mr. Mohit Adlakha reisdent of chembur near Ashish Cinema, all of sudden the neighbour row house ; 2 rottweiler breed dog came out of the gate and attacked Ninja brutally on the main road, the maid got hurt in the attack, which resulted in serious dog bite case.
Ninja was rushed to Happy Tails HealthCare Services in Govandi East, and was admitted in emergency care centre. The attending Doctor Umesh Karkare suggested surgery and team of vet had performed emergency surgery and was stabilised with medicine. 

Ninja is in critical condition and observation under daily veterinary care. Mr. Mohit and his family were upset with the incident and were in shock, so the family decided to take action against the Rottweiler Pet dog owner named R R Pandiyan.

Mr. Mohit called up Salim Charania (President of Pawa India) refereed by Co-Founder of Yoda Organisation Mrs. Pooja Sakpal. Salim heard the whole incident from Mohit.

On 29th September 2015, Salim & lata with Mohit reached Happy Tails HealthCare Services in Govandi and Met the attending Dr. Umesh Karkare and requested for the Medical Certificate for the Police Case. The Medical History and Examination printed reports of 10 pages which include every minute details & surgery photographs  were given to Salim. Pawa India is impressed by Happy Tails Health Care Services which is very professional and organised. The reports were printed in 15 minutes which they have record stored in their Computers. 

Pawa India team with complainer & the witnessed reached RCF Police Station and met the PSI Duty officer named Bhaukar, Salim & Lata explained the incident and requested the officer to register the FIR under IPC 289, 324 & 429. The duty officer discussed the case with the senior and with the conversation & discussion with the complainer, witness and Pawa India team, the Fir was registered under IPC 289, 324 & 429. 

The accused R R Pandiyan was called to police station next day for further action on him on basis of above IPC Section mentioned in the FIR.

Pawa India team is not against the Rottweiler dogs who attacked another dog, but they are against the pet owner and their care taker who are not responsible and are not in a state to take proper care and training to their pet dogs. Pawa India team request all the pet owner to take care of their pet dog, showing negligence which results in harm to animals and human, the FIR can be registered against them.

What does IPC Section says 

IPC 289 - Whoever knowingly or negligently omits to take such order with any animal in his possession as is sufficient to guard against any probable danger to human life, or any probable danger of grievous hurt from such animal, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.

IPC 324 - Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 334, voluntarily causes hurt by means of any instrument for shooting, stabbing or cutting, or any instrument which, used as weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or any corrosive substance, or by means of any explosive substance or by means of any substance which it is deleterious to the human body to inhale, to swallow, or to receive into the blood, or by means of any animal, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

IPC 429 -  Whoever commits mischief by killing, poisoning, maiming or rendering useless, any elephant, camel, horse, mule, buffalo, bull, cow or ox, whatever may be the value thereof, or any other animal of the value of fifty rupees or upwards, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both.



No comments:

Post a Comment

We request you to keep comments civilised and non-personal.